Welcome to HostingForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

wiki software selection advice ?

 
   Web Hosting Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Webmaster RSS
Next:  Apache2 on XP  
Author Message
wbsurfver

External


Since: Mar 27, 2007
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:10 am
Post subject: wiki software selection advice ?
Archived from groups: php>general, others (more info?)

We have a short list of wiki software listed below that we are
evaluating. The project will also be using wordpress and there will
need to be some integration between the wiki and wordpress. It seems a
wiki that can use mysql and is also PHP based would be favorable.

I had also considered DBM/DBA which are object persistent databases,
but our team does not seem to favor that solution, though I have not
really analyzed that approach or have enough experience to feel I
understand all possible advantages or disadvantages that it might
have. I have not been able to find a DBM that works with PHP on
windows which some development will be on. It has been mentioned that
DBA is not going to cache the way a database does, although I also
heard somewhere else it would be faster and I suspect using memcache
with DBA would work, but I am not sure if there would be references
inside the objects that would cause a problem with that ?

I had looked into phpwiki, but had many problems with the install on
windows and I didn't see that it have very good wysiwyg editing.

Anyway, the short list:

mediawiki
bitweaver
jspwiki
snipsnap

pmwiki is set up to use flatfiles, so we may be dropping that,
although possibly it could be modified to work with mysql.

 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
wbsurfver

External


Since: Mar 27, 2007
Posts: 2



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:22 pm
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>www>webmaster, others (more info?)

On Mar 27, 9:17 pm, SueDoeCyAnts <pseud... DeleteThis @labb.port5.com> wrote:
> on Tue 27 Mar 2007 09:10:05a
> "wbsurf...@yahoo.com" <wbsurf... DeleteThis @gmail.com> posted
> innews:1175011805.770577.206210@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Anyway, the short list:
>
> > mediawiki
> > bitweaver
> > jspwiki
> > snipsnap
>
> Even without your providing any sense of the total project size
> for it document base, its usage or the server you plan to run it
> on, it seems to me that you've elimimnated both snipsnap and
> jspwiki, as both are java based. Jspwiki requires a servlet
> engine, and snipsnap looks as if it's a miniwiki, possibly not
> what you're looking for.
>
> Meidiawiki is the backend that wikipedia runs on. It is probably
> the software that most would cosider to be the wiki standard on
> the web. it will scale, has a very good versioning and editing
> system, as well as many extras. If your team has a couple of
> decent PHP coders. It should be able to do anything a wiki is
> expected to do without much extra fuss. A possible downside is
> unless there is some serious template modifications, it will look
> like a media wiki product a first glance to any who are aware of a
> few mediawiki run sites. I do not know if there is a wordpress
> accessibile method readily available for mediawiki, but given that
> both sites are actively deve;loped, and both have a large number
> of coders, I'd be surprised if there wasn't something available
> from at least one side, and possible both.
>
> BitWeaver is a very nice complete CMS package, which includes a
> wiki engine. I cannot recall ever having messed around with the
> bitweaver wiki, but I would assume it is of the same quality as
> the parts of the package I am more familiar with and would expect
> setup and default usability to be easy for a CMS package. It uses
> smarty as it templating engine. Whether that is a positigve or
> negative depends entirely on the past experience of your team
> members. Smarty is generally a bit less of a bastard on the
> learning curve than some PHP templating systems, but rest assured,
> if no one has used it before, there will be a learning curve
> before workable templates for the site will be created. If you
> decide on using bitweaver, then if possible, try to migrate any
> preexistent wordpress files over to the bitweaver blog backend.
> It will save you grief having it all bundled into one package. I
> haven't a clue about bitweaver's ability to integrate wordpress
> into a production.


Thanks,

Snip snap caught my attention because it uses groovy and I have done a
good deal of Ruby on Rails stuff.

It seems the java wikis may be a hard sell unless there is a
compelling reason to go that way.
One of our developers has java experience but not PHP, but I think the
push will be for a PHP code based solution. I posted the following in
a java database and php.general:


We are choosing wiki and blog software which may bpth end up being
PHP, but if one was java based and the other PHP I was curious if PHP
and Java can read/write the same type of DBA/DBM style database which
I beleive is an object oriented style database that Perl/PHP use as I
have done some of this in Perl. I expect this might be complex or not
possible, but I am curious. Otherwise two seperate systems based on 2
different languages could not share any code that created objects
rendered by the web server and there could not be a subsytem in one
language that the other interfaced with. The other possibility would
be an XML based solution, but not sure if the complexity on that would
be worth it or an easy sell to others. I had also seen a snip snap
wiki which is groovy based that caught my attention.

 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
SueDoeCyAnts

External


Since: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 3



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:06 pm
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

on Tue 27 Mar 2007 09:10:05a
"wbsurfver@yahoo.com" <wbsurfver.DeleteThis@gmail.com> posted
in news:1175011805.770577.206210@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:


> Anyway, the short list:
>
> mediawiki
> bitweaver
> jspwiki
> snipsnap
>
Even without your providing any sense of the total project size
for it document base, its usage or the server you plan to run it
on, it seems to me that you've elimimnated both snipsnap and
jspwiki, as both are java based. Jspwiki requires a servlet
engine, and snipsnap looks as if it's a miniwiki, possibly not
what you're looking for.

Meidiawiki is the backend that wikipedia runs on. It is probably
the software that most would cosider to be the wiki standard on
the web. it will scale, has a very good versioning and editing
system, as well as many extras. If your team has a couple of
decent PHP coders. It should be able to do anything a wiki is
expected to do without much extra fuss. A possible downside is
unless there is some serious template modifications, it will look
like a media wiki product a first glance to any who are aware of a
few mediawiki run sites. I do not know if there is a wordpress
accessibile method readily available for mediawiki, but given that
both sites are actively deve;loped, and both have a large number
of coders, I'd be surprised if there wasn't something available
from at least one side, and possible both.

BitWeaver is a very nice complete CMS package, which includes a
wiki engine. I cannot recall ever having messed around with the
bitweaver wiki, but I would assume it is of the same quality as
the parts of the package I am more familiar with and would expect
setup and default usability to be easy for a CMS package. It uses
smarty as it templating engine. Whether that is a positigve or
negative depends entirely on the past experience of your team
members. Smarty is generally a bit less of a bastard on the
learning curve than some PHP templating systems, but rest assured,
if no one has used it before, there will be a learning curve
before workable templates for the site will be created. If you
decide on using bitweaver, then if possible, try to migrate any
preexistent wordpress files over to the bitweaver blog backend.
It will save you grief having it all bundled into one package. I
haven't a clue about bitweaver's ability to integrate wordpress
into a production.
 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Andy Dingley

External


Since: Mar 24, 2006
Posts: 248



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 28 Mar, 05:22, "wbsurf...@yahoo.com" <wbsurf....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems the java wikis may be a hard sell unless there is a
> compelling reason to go that way.

We're a hardcore Java shop, I hate PHP and I'm hungry for reasons to
fool with Groovy. Hosting Java is trivial for us, especially in-house.

We're still using MediaWiki though. It might be based on an ugly
platform, but it's the Wiki product with the most work going into it
and best features.
 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
SueDoeCyAnts

External


Since: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 3



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

on Wed 28 Mar 2007 03:02:10a
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat.TakeThisOut@codesmiths.com> posted
in news:1175076130.923977.132560@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> On 28 Mar, 05:22, "wbsurf...@yahoo.com" <wbsurf....TakeThisOut@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It seems the java wikis may be a hard sell unless there is a
>> compelling reason to go that way.
>
> We're a hardcore Java shop, I hate PHP and I'm hungry for
> reasons to fool with Groovy. Hosting Java is trivial for us,
> especially in-house.
>
> We're still using MediaWiki though. It might be based on an ugly
> platform, but it's the Wiki product with the most work going
> into it and best features.
>
Have you ever run into JLibrary?
<http://jlibrary.sourceforge.net/>

Was thinking about toying around with it
for a potential option as a collaboration engine.
Don't waste time if you haven't seen it, as I'm
probably going to try it out anyway on some presently
underused leased server space that offers Tomcat setup
as a click install through the web panel. I've been
meaning to test their default setup anyway, but haven't
set aside the time.
 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Andy Dingley

External


Since: Mar 24, 2006
Posts: 248



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:35 am
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 1 Apr, 15:10, SueDoeCyAnts <pseud....RemoveThis@labb.port5.com> wrote:

> Have you ever run into JLibrary?
> <http://jlibrary.sourceforge.net/>

Yes, some time ago and I hated it (proabably unfairly).

I'm a metadata geek (RDF, DC, SW, et al.). jLibrary's approach here is
trivial and years obsolete. It might work fine as a product, but it
excludes a large area that I'm particularly interested in and so it's
of little interest to me.
 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
SueDoeCyAnts

External


Since: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 3



(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:37 pm
Post subject: Re: wiki software selection advice ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

on Mon 02 Apr 2007 02:35:55a
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat DeleteThis @codesmiths.com> posted
in news:1175506555.544081.118080@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> On 1 Apr, 15:10, SueDoeCyAnts <pseud... DeleteThis @labb.port5.com> wrote:
>
>> Have you ever run into JLibrary?
>> <http://jlibrary.sourceforge.net/>
>
> Yes, some time ago and I hated it (proabably unfairly).
>
> I'm a metadata geek (RDF, DC, SW, et al.). jLibrary's approach
> here is trivial and years obsolete. It might work fine as a
> product, but it excludes a large area that I'm particularly
> interested in and so it's of little interest to me.
>
Thank-you very much. You criticisms broadly run along some of my
doubts. What caught my eye was the win GUI to ease in user
implementation. Bells, whistles and eye candy. Still it would be
nice to discover a decent opensource codebase for project
collaboration that had a decent user/visitor site rights and
restrictions interface, a DB for non-public reference documents, a
members only arena for thrashing and rethrasing work in progress
documents, replete with good versioning functionality, and a place to
publish unrestricted pages for public viewing, although this last one
is really a non-essential triviality, as any finished product could
easily be forwarded to a different servlet c.

thanks again
 >> Stay informed about: wiki software selection advice ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Web Hosting Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Webmaster All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]