galactic overlord wrote:
[top-posting corrected]
> <www.probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
> news:4710f75c.123652375@news.freenetname.co.uk...
>> David Hennessy <david RemoveThis @maidix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Hennessy wrote:
>>>> Hi! I've just made a site for my friend's therapeutic massage practice.
>>>> I'd be interested to know what you all think! *puts on thick skin*
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wow. I'm glad I put my thick skin on now.
>>>
>>> *ahem* The URL is: http://midnightsun.maidix.com/
>>>
>> Looks great.
>>
> Nice.
>
This is wrong in so many ways.
Not only did you top-post your reply, but you made it to a post from
October, 2007. How do you expect your expansive and comprehensive
critique ("Nice.") to help the OP with his site development almost seven
months later? Did you think he was waiting for your go-ahead?
And now you've got me responding to you, to boot.
--
John
The UIP:
http://improve-usenet.org/
Blocking GoogleGroupers isn't enough.
>> Stay informed about: Site Check, Please! :-)