Yes, that sentence is incorrect. I will have it fixed. Hmm, it doesn't
even have the right #define variable name at all.
Only SF_NOTIFY_READ_RAW_DATA is incompatible with worker process isolation
mode.
--
//David
IIS
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
//
"Michael Corcoran" <anonymous RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:00e401c3cfc6$9db86ed0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
So, does that mean that the following documentation is
incorrect when it says that "ISAPI filters that register
for SF_READ_RAW_DATA or SF_SEND_RAW_DATA notifications are
not supported in worker process isolation mode"?
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-" target="_blank">http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-</a>
us/iissdk/iis/changes_in_isapi_filter_features.asp?
frame=true
Thanks,
Mike.
>-----Original Message-----
>In IIS6, it's still SEND_RAW_DATA to access the response
data.
>
>--
>//David
>IIS
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
>//
>"Michael Corcoran" <anonymous RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
>news:044101c3cf4a$33e856e0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>
>Hi,
>
>I am wondering what the proper approach is to implement
>ISAPI Filter SF_NOTIFY_SEND_RAW_DATA 'like' functionality
>in IIS 6.
>
>I have a filter, which is well tested and works fine in
>IIS 5, that won't load in IIS 6 under Worker Process
>Isolation Mode. This is because it makes use of both
>RAW_DATA notifications (READ and SEND)...
>
>The IIS 6 docs say that the READ_RAW_DATA functionality
>can be accomplished by the HSE_REQ_EXEC_URL support
>function... But what about the SEND_RAW_DATA
>functionality? What is the best approach to gain access
>to the outgoing data for any given request?
>
>Thanks,
>Mike.
>
>
>.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: IIS 6 and SEND_RAW_DATA Filters