On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 17:22:12 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups RemoveThis @schestowitz.com> wrote:
>__/ [Toby Inkster] on Saturday 03 September 2005 08:41 \__
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> It quickly slides into non-technical issues and dialogues that are hard
>>> to follow.
>>
>> No point in turning this group into another alt.html. We already have
>> alt.html for that.
>
>Yes, but HTML <> Webmaster.
Depends. Some webmasters don't do the HTML but work on other
components within the site. Some webmasters only do/use HTML and not
anything else. Then you have webmasters who seek out new content ideas
for those sites - which some of the conversations on this NG can/may
inspire. Webmaster can be a broad term ...
That doesn't mean this group has to be another HTML or "all techie,all
the time" group.
<personal view>
I cut back even lurking in a couple of the 'technical' groups due to
them becoming increasing colder, in my opinion. Some good advice still
shared in those groups ... but ... I just don't enjoy their atmosphere
any more.. A shame actually as I lurked/sometimes posted in a few of
them over the past *mumble* years.
</personal view>
>I am still reluctant to get involved in threads,
>which in this newsgroup can go on for a very long time, even when not
>labelled [OT].
Your option as some people simply do not enjoy long threads or
non-technical discussions mixed in with technical ones.
I enjoy those threads which has this group a bit more welcoming and
rounded out in atmosphere. Even with my current online time
limitations I regularly download this group's and one other NG's
posts to enjoy with a fresh pot of coffee. Can those threads get out
of hand from time to time? Sure - happens, in a different way, on the
technical groups. *shrug*
Not every NG with a technical term somehow in its name has to try
being "technical discussions only".
I find it enjoyable to let my (short) hair down while reading and
enjoying techie discussions. You may notice I do that also in another
group you mentioned also enjoying .. that atmosphere can be atmosphere
can be casual and having threads dwindle to off-topic bantering
between people - although I admit most of those threads do not go on
for weeks but some have been revisited by creating new threads to
reference back to those prior discussions/debates/et al ... so, in a
way, can go on for months.
>I respect everyone else's preference, which evidently is
>>largely different than mine.
It would be a dull world if everyone and every group was expected to
fit into the same mold - in my personal opinion. Something to set
yourself or a group apart from others isn't a bad thing. After all,
don't webmasters try to give tsites individuality to help those be
different from other sites on the web?
>Like I said, this message did not embrace the
>offence.
Carol
>> Stay informed about: How to Improve this Newsgroup