"Fatwa Sam" <sam.DeleteThis@janetandsamwithoutanyspam.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bus3bj$m0o$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> "Marc Bissonnette" <dragnet.DeleteThis@internalysis.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9479A2CD4AD4dragnetinternalysisc@207.35.177.135...
> > I thought this was rather funny:
> >
<font color=green> > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8</font" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8</font</a>>
> > &q=search+engine&btnG=Google+Search
>
> I must say, that's very sporting of them......I suppose if you're already
> using their search engine to run the search, you're probably looking for
> someone elses site, and not theirs which you're already using, and
probably
> already know how to find.....
....unless you are using one of the myriad other sites that uses Googles
results.
--
"We had ten times as many shots on target as Bolton, and they had none at
all..."
(SIR BOBBY ROBSON)
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.private-eye.co.uk" target="_blank">http://www.private-eye.co.uk</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Google needs their own SEO