In article <41dcedc3.43738833 DeleteThis @news.ntlworld.com>, Matt Probert says...
> Once upon a time, far far away, the king summoned Daniel Ruscoe
> <danruscoe DeleteThis @gmail.com> who replied:
>
> >I don't want to kick off a debate on tables vs CSS here, but can anybody
> >point me in the direction of some good, client-friendly (not too
> >technical) articles on the advantages of CSS and web standards over
> >tables and poorly written code?
>
> Er, there seems to be a fundamental naivety of concept here. To use
> the term "tables vs CSS" is like to use the term "apples vs football
> matches". They are two totally different and separate entities.
The advantages of CSS over tables in terms of accessibility and SEO,
then
> Similarly, tables are not "non-standard" nor "poorly written code".
Sorry, I wasn't clear there. I meant CSS Vs tables and W3C compliance Vs
poorly written code. Two seperate points. Tables aren't poorly written
code, but most of the time they are poorly implemented code!
> And before you ask, no the use of tables does not increase the
> likelihood of contracting osteoperosis, nor lung cancer.
Bet you it does.
--
Daniel Ruscoe<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Good articles on advantages of CSS?